Navigation
Public engagement

Becoming a Scientist

Read online for free

Print your own copy

Virus Fighter

Build a virus or fight a pandemic!

Play online

Maya's Marvellous Medicine

Read online for free

Print your own copy

Battle Robots of the Blood

Read online for free

Print your own copy

Just for Kids! All about Coronavirus

Read online for free

Print your own copy

Archive
LabListon on Twitter

Entries in science communication (77)

Friday
Mar082024

Liston-Dooley lab at the Cambridge Festival!

Our lab is gearing up for the Cambridge Festival! A lot of amazing activities, with something for everyone, so hopefully everyone in Cambridge can come and join at least one of these.

First of all, for our youngest visitors come along to a book reading of our kids books "Maya's Marvellous Medicine" and "Battle Robots of the Blood". We'll have some colouring in too, to keep them busy.

For kids a little older, Family Day at Pathology has a ton of activities! Our lab is hosting a display of "VirusFighter". See how your kids would have done as PM during the pandemic, or test whether they can successfully engineer a bioweapon to stop an invasion of wombats! (They can also play online now!)

 For all ages, we have a real treat, Sensory Science. This is a fantastic program that uses multi-sensory art to communicate the science of pathology. Honestly, everyone should come and experience this exhibit at St Catharine's College, the teams have put in so much work into their art piece. Our lab has coordinate the program and is exhibiting new art on neuroinflammation and cancer formation. We are also hosting the amazing Dr Erica Tandori, who started the Sensory Science movement back in Australia, and specialises in making science communication accessible to the blind and low vision community.

Finally, adults interested in the immune system are welcome to join my public seminar on how diversity shapes our immune responses!

Thursday
Dec212023

2023 Lafferty debate

The Lafferty debate is, for me, always the highlight of the Australian and New Zealand Society of Immunology annual meeting. The comedic faux-scientific debate is always a huge amount of fun, and is part of what creates the community feeling of immunology within Australia and New Zealand. 

Being asked to take-part in the debate, 20 years after leaving Australia, was, by contrast, petrifying. 

Debates have always felt like something I should enjoy doing, but actually the need to argue one side, regardless of how logic pans out, it something extremely foreign to me. To do so in a funny manner, in front of hundreds of my colleagues, on the big moment of the year... that is just not me. 

I'm up on stage, giving talks and fielding questions, so often that I should have felt comfortable with the "let's wing it and have fun" approach of my team members. But for whatever reason, anything other than a scientific talk triggers my performance phobia, and this really made me anxious!

A huge relief that both teams of the debate played off each other so well, the comedic timing landed, and the whole event was actually really enjoyable! I'm not sure I'd ever sign up for it again, but I am really glad that I was a part of such a key event with talented and funny immunologists.

Wednesday
Aug232023

Zombie Viruses: Fascinating and a Little Frightening

See the full article on WebMD, written by Caitlin Taylor.

“There is a small risk that a frozen virus that gets unearthed is able to start an infection chain that ends up in humans,” says Adrian Liston, PhD. “On the one hand, we would not have pre-existing immunity against it, so the initial ability to combat the infection is low. On the other hand, the virus would not be adapted to infect (modern-day) humans, so the chance of an initial infection being successful for the virus is extremely low.”

“‘Entry events’ do happen, very rarely, and they can shape human evolution,” says Liston. “Major examples would be smallpox (a virus) and tuberculosis (a bacteria), which strongly influenced human evolution when they entered our species, selecting for the type of immune system that was able to fight them and killing off individuals with the ‘wrong’ type of immune system.”

“The most important take-home message is that climate change is going to create unexpected problems,” says Liston. “It isn’t simply changes to weather, climate events, and sea levels rising. A whole cascade of secondary problems will be generated. New infections, some of which could go pandemic, are almost certainly going to happen because of climate change.”
Thursday
Nov242022

Using animal models to study traumatic brain injury

Monday
Jun202022

'Eureka moment' as impact of brain injury in mice reduced

Wednesday
Jun152022

Brain Tregs on The Immunology Podcast

Listen to a great episode of The Immunology Podcast to hear a section on our recent paper about brain Tregs.

Wednesday
Jun012022

Drugs, Vaccines and a Hopeful Future: Exploring Advances in Multiple Sclerosis Research

I was interested by Ruairi Mackenzie from Technology Networks for World Multiple Sclerosis Day. Here is the resulting article:

 

World Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Day recognizes the millions of people worldwide who are affected by this neuroimmunological disease. The campaign site for World MS Day 2022 strikes an optimistic chord, seeing the date as a chance to “celebrate global solidarity and hope for the future”. This year, there is more reason to buy into that optimism that ever before.

 Recognizing the immune basis of MS

Adrian Liston, a group leader at the Babraham Institute, based near Cambridge, UK, is well-placed to explain that sunny outlook. He first studied MS as part of an undergraduate project.  Over the two decades since, Liston has continued to research in the MS field, watching science’s understanding of the disease deepen.

“I think the most profound change has been the recognition that MS is an immune-mediated disease,” says Liston. The symptoms of MS are neurological – patients experience a range of sensory and motor conditions, including fatigue, numbness, spasms and weakness and loss of control over muscle movement or function. While MS has long been thought to include an immune component – Jean Martin Charcot, the French doctor who first described the disease, noted the presence of immune cells in patients’ spinal cords – it was only  recently that the immune-mediation of the disease was fully understood. It’s now recognized that the neurological symptoms are a consequence of immune cells infiltrating the brain and attacking the myelin sheath coating that permits normal nerve cell conduction.

Part of that understanding came from the galloping pace of genetics research. The neurological symptoms of MS are in contrast with its genetic signature, explains Liston. From a geneticist’s point of view, “MS looks a lot like Type 1 diabetes, or any of these other autoimmune diseases, and the same genes are controlling it,” he says.

These genetic insights were added to a rapidly growing body of preclinical research. Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) is an inflammatory autoimmune disease seen in animals that mimics the disease course of MS. This model proved essential for the development of drugs for MS. Liston explains that these drugs came in two waves. The first was heralded by the approval of interferon beta-1b in 1993, the first drug capable of altering the course of MS. The interferons, which reduce the number of immune cells crossing the blood-brain barrier, showed success at improving MS symptoms. This provided direct evidence that adopting an immune-targeting approach could help patients.

A new generation of drugs

For some, these early drugs have proved enduringly beneficial and remain their main course of treatment years later. MS drug development, however, continued to refine the targeting of the immune system. “What we really we have now is the second wave of drug generation, where we have much more sophisticated immune-modulating molecules, and we can really target very specific pathways of cells that are causing the damage,” says Liston. These new drugs (there are 23 FDA-approved mediations for MS as of 2022) work better and for longer.

Liston says that an MS patient today can expect fewer symptoms and far longer periods of good health than in the past. 85% of MS patients have a relapsing-remitting form of the disease, which sees symptoms wax and wane. While 20 years ago MS may have induced multiple relapses each year, with potentially permanent loss of function a risk each time, today a patient that responds well to the latest treatments can expect to go five or even ten years without any further relapses, says Liston: “It gives them a life well beyond diagnosis, which wasn't the case 20 years ago.”

The focus of these treatments is to minimize the damage of any immune attack on the brain. Can we also restore function lost during these attacks? Research in this area is progressing, if at a much slower rate. Data presented in 2020 showed that a compound, bexarotene (full disclosure: I’ve published research on this drug myself) was shown to restore some of the myelin lost during the disease course. Side effects of the drug and limited clinical impact meant bexarotene was not taken forward to approval. The challenges of restoring the damaged brain are significant, but this research shows that, in principle, healing the brain’s myelin might one day be possible.

A vaccine to prevent MS?

In the meantime, other findings have pointed a way to intercept MS earlier, stopping the disease in its tracks before it can ever cause damage to the brain.

It all begins with a virus.

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), a type of herpesvirus, has long been associated with MS – studies had noted a higher risk of contracting MS after previously having infectious mononucleosis (IM), a disease caused by EBV – but a “smoking gun” had been hard to identify.

This is because up to 95% of the adult population have EBV, which is an incredibly successful virus that, after infecting a host, can lay dormant for years. Designing the right sort of study to test whether getting EBV would later increase your MS risk was therefore a huge logistical challenge. In January, however, researchers at Harvard Medical School met that challenge. Using a longitudinal method, the team collected blood serum samples from US military personnel, who are required to submit a blood serum sample at the start of and then after every two years of their service.

With samples from 10 million different people stored, the study was easily able to identify individuals who didn’t have EBV during their first sample, as well as those who developed MS during the course of their service. The study showed that, of 35 individuals who tested negative for EBV on enrolling, all but one of them went on to become infected with EBV before developing MS.

This corresponds to a 32-fold increased risk of developing MS. To put this in perspective, the strongest genetic risk factor for MS – which involves having a set of particular immune genes – confers a three-fold risk. This association is so strong, that the study, in Liston’s opinion, “finished the argument” on whether EBV plays a causal role in MS. The underlying theory is that, in some individuals, the body responds to the presence of the virus by mistakenly attacking the brain’s myelin sheath, triggering MS’s symptoms.

“Incredibly profound” implications

The finding and its implications, says Liston, are “incredibly profound”: “I'd say the best analogy is of human papilloma virus (HPV) and cervical cancer. Cervical cancer and some anal cancers as well are largely caused by infections with the virus, HPV. Now that knowledge was very controversial for a long time.”

The evidence linking HPV and cervical cancer is now solid, Liston says: “Most people who have the virus never get the cancer. But what that allows us to do is then go and develop vaccines for HPV. By preventing the infection, you essentially prevent the cancer formation.”

If a similar approach could be taken with EBV – vaccinating every child against the virus before they are infected – future generations could essentially be protected from ever acquiring MS. That’s a hugely exciting prospect. There is much more research to be done, however, before that reality is met. Liston points out that EBV “is not a trivial virus to attack” – it tends to hide within patients’ B cells and is happy to remain concealed there for a patient’s lifetime. Much more work will need to be conducted on how to target EBV and on the steps between infection and symptoms of MS.

The future of MS research

For now, says Liston, anyone interested in following the progress of the MS field should pay special attention to studies that improve the personalization of existing treatments. “We really want to be able to match up which medication is going to work on which person. In the case of MS, that is probably the single most important thing,” he explains. Currently, patients can endure multiple relapses while testing out which treatment works best for them. Work into matching patients with certain backgrounds and disease progressions with an appropriate drug could be hugely significant, says Liston.

The other exciting advance he mentions is the creation of better targeted drugs. Despite the advances of second-generation MS drugs, Liston says that in terms of specificity, they are essentially immune sledgehammers.

“In someone with MS, only 0.1% of their white blood cells are dangerous,” he says. But current treatments hit that 0.1% alongside a vast swathe of the rest of the immune system, which can have extreme side effects. New generations of drugs, Liston explains, will be better targeted at immune culprits. One field, antigen-specific tolerance work, looks to suppress the incorrect response by confused immune cells, restoring the balance of the immune system without impairing it from its important role of protecting our body against outside threats.

Time to be excited about the present

Is Liston hopeful about the future of MS research? “It’s not even just the future,” he responds, “I’m actually quite positive about the present of MS compared to where we were 20 years ago.”

The promise that drugs targeting the immune system could help MS patients has been well met. “We're not talking about cold fusion, where they've been promising boundless energy in 10 years’ time, and promising that for 40 years, we’re talking about a place where the promises have been delivered over and over,” says Liston. He believes that patients are going to continue to have longer, healthier lives as drugs improve and become smarter and more targeted.

The only note of caution Liston sounds is in managing our expectations: “We're not going to have these type of ‘Eureka!’ moments where there's one tablet that just cures MS, but we will be coming closer and closer to a place where there will be a treatment regime that works on almost every patient and is almost perfect.”

Those advances will partly come from innovative use of the latest techniques – Liston’s lab recently published work where gene therapy was used to edit a small fraction of cells in the brain. The edit caused these cells to produce a pro-survival molecule in the surrounding brain area. This is turn helped increase the numbers of regulatory T cell (Tregs) – a cell able to suppress damaging immune responses – in the brain. In animal models, the longer-living Tregs were able to not only improve MS-like symptoms but facilitate quicker healing from brain injury.

Neurological disease can so often seem intractable, beset by the complications of the brain and our still juvenile understanding of how the biological wonders in our heads function and fail. But on World MS Day 2022, there is plenty good news, at least in one small corner of brain medicine. “This is a very hopeful time for patients,” Liston concludes.

Sunday
Jan232022

Maya's Marvellous Medicine

Wednesday
Dec012021

Public Engagement award for the VirusFighter team

Congratulations to the VirusFighter team for winning the Babraham Institute Public Engagement Award! VirusFighter is the reincarnation of VirusBreak. Over the last year I've worked with the PhD students in our lab, Amy Dashwood, Ntombizodwa Makuyana and Magda Ali, together with lab alumni David Posner, to create missions for VirusFighter - allowing the player to be Prime Minister of the UK during different virus outbreaks. GameDoctor created the interface, with liason via the PE team here at the Babraham Institute.

Congrats to Amy, Tombi, Magda and David - a huge contribution to scientific communication, and all during the first year of their PhDs!

 

Monday
Nov292021

VirusFighter

I'm very excited to announce the release of our new game, VirusFigher!

VirusFighter simulates the outbreak of viruses in the UK. Try the free play mode, and learn how small tweaks to viral lethality, virulence or incubation time change the dynamics of an outbreak. Test whether quarantine, social distancing or vaccination is the best approach for different viruses, and track the lives lost, the burden to the NHS and the economic cost.  

Or perhaps try mission mode: how would you do as Prime Minister during an outbreak of flu or COVID? Think you could do better? Listen to the advice of an immunologist at each critical decision point, and see how many lives your decisions cost. It is not always easy - see what the economist says and keep an eye on the economic cost too! When you've got that down pat, give a shot at something more exotic - an Ebola outbreak, or the "Big One" that gives virologists nightmares - Ebola gone airborne. Don't get too cocky with your good results managing COVID though, different outbreaks are best managed with different strategies. 

VirusFighter is a neat tool for understanding how viruses spread and can be contained, for adults and children alike. Thanks to Simon Andrews for generating the original VirusBreak engine, GameDoctor for the new game engine behind VirusFighter, the Babraham PE team, and the science team: Amy Dashwood, Ntombizodwa Makuyana, Magda Ali and David Posner.